http://www.colossiansthreesixteen.com/archives/67 Mon, 08 Sep 2008 06:32:52 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1 http://www.colossiansthreesixteen.com/archives/67#comment-136 Brent Fri, 28 Oct 2005 19:07:00 +0000 http://www.colossiansthreesixteen.com/?p=67#comment-136 Ah, but don't misunderstand, there is certainly still a future aspect to the Kingdom. Ah, but don’t misunderstand, there is certainly still a future aspect to the Kingdom.

]]> http://www.colossiansthreesixteen.com/archives/67#comment-135 Dyspraxic Fundamentalist Fri, 28 Oct 2005 18:17:00 +0000 http://www.colossiansthreesixteen.com/?p=67#comment-135 Interesting stuff. I prefer a more Dispensational approach, seeing the Kingdom as postponed. Interesting stuff. I prefer a more Dispensational approach, seeing the Kingdom as postponed.

]]> http://www.colossiansthreesixteen.com/archives/67#comment-134 Eldon Thu, 27 Oct 2005 04:35:00 +0000 http://www.colossiansthreesixteen.com/?p=67#comment-134 George E-L-D-O-N Ladd!!!! George E-L-D-O-N Ladd!!!!

]]> http://www.colossiansthreesixteen.com/archives/67#comment-133 Brent Wed, 26 Oct 2005 15:59:00 +0000 http://www.colossiansthreesixteen.com/?p=67#comment-133 I agree, but I admit that much of my interaction with Moore's book was colored by just having finished Pearcey's "Totatl Truth" prior. So, it seemed for me that Moore was showing some theological groundwork for Pearcey's "Total Truth" approach. I would also ground this in the "New Creation/Re-Creation" work of Christ, but I often found myself looking beyond what both Moore and Henry were saying to the larger implications which are certainly there, even if not stated. I agree, but I admit that much of my interaction with Moore’s book was colored by just having finished Pearcey’s “Totatl Truth” prior. So, it seemed for me that Moore was showing some theological groundwork for Pearcey’s “Total Truth” approach. I would also ground this in the “New Creation/Re-Creation” work of Christ, but I often found myself looking beyond what both Moore and Henry were saying to the larger implications which are certainly there, even if not stated.

]]> http://www.colossiansthreesixteen.com/archives/67#comment-132 Sean Wed, 26 Oct 2005 15:40:00 +0000 http://www.colossiansthreesixteen.com/?p=67#comment-132 I'm a huge Ladd fan, I might even be a Laddite or something odd like that, but I'm having a hard time agreeing with the definitive thesis that has been nailed to the door in Moore's book (I still have one chapter to go, so my mind might change). It seems like there's this disconnect between our roles as prophets, priests, and kings (kings in particular) in this age where the Kingdom is already but not yet and the place of the church. Hopefully when I'm done reading the book I can see how he places our roles within the context of the church, but I have a feeling I'll be left wondering whether or not Carl F. H. Henry had only a passion for evangelicalism (which is great!) and not so much for an establishment of ecclessiology within that evangelicalism. I’m a huge Ladd fan, I might even be a Laddite or something odd like that, but I’m having a hard time agreeing with the definitive thesis that has been nailed to the door in Moore’s book (I still have one chapter to go, so my mind might change). It seems like there’s this disconnect between our roles as prophets, priests, and kings (kings in particular) in this age where the Kingdom is already but not yet and the place of the church. Hopefully when I’m done reading the book I can see how he places our roles within the context of the church, but I have a feeling I’ll be left wondering whether or not Carl F. H. Henry had only a passion for evangelicalism (which is great!) and not so much for an establishment of ecclessiology within that evangelicalism.

]]>